It is currently Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:50 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Does Hyperflexion in Dressage Constitute Abuse?
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Iowa
I have heard a lot of people discussing this topic, since many of the upper level dressage riders are using it and winning. But this technique has been marred by controversy- so much so, in fact, that the FEI convened an ad hoc committee to study the question of whether or not rolkur is cruel to the horse. It was decided that hyperflexion to that degree can cause neck and spinal injuries, not to mention that it can also interfere with the horse's breathing and cause respiratory problems.

For those of you who don't know what "rolkur" or "hyperflexion" is, it is drawing the horse's head deeply down and back towards its chest, literally performing at different gaits and patterns with its chin tucked against its chest. You can view more information on it at these links:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iQczIOO99k
http://www.eurodressage.com/news/dressage/fei/06-02-workshop.html

My opinion is that it fits in with other abuse that goes on behind the scenes in the show horse world...soring a horse, nicking its tail, affecting its feet to make it step higher, tying its head up high in its stall all night to make it have a low head-set in the ring the next day...these are atrocities done by people who put winning over the wellbeing of their horse. Knowingly participating in a practice that is documented to cause pain and discomfort to a horse is a form of abuse.

What do you think?

_________________
DaisyKJ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:27 pm
Posts: 50
Well, you asked for an opinion so here goes... Much of what we do with horses in not natural. I rarely see horses running across a pasture completely collected, HOWEVER, I agree that training can go too far. I would never sacrifice a horse's soundness for a ribbon. I like my horses to look and be happy doing their job. I think soring etc. is wrong. I have saddlebreds and I do show a couple of them saddleseat. I try not to ask them to do anything that is really unnatural for them. Of the 5 asbs that I own, only 3 are suitable for SS. In other words, they trot through the pasture with elevation (no training, just breeding). My other two asbs are hunter pleasure horses, as that discipline suits them. They move very naturally and are asked to move in a collected manner that suits their conformation.

I'm with you DaisyKJ. None of us should be sacrificing soundness etc. I think all horseman should choose to put their horses in the discipline that best suits that particular horse. As for the Rollkur..WOW, that does look a bit overflexed. Personally, I love to watch dressage, but I occasionally question the happiness of the horse at the higher levels. I'll bet this sounds odd coming from an SS person. I am sure that many people see saddlebreds and think that the head carriage is abnormally high. My SS horses actually carry their heads pretty high. If they didn't, they would likely be hunters :). Here is my disclaimer: I don't know anything about training a dressage horse. My words are strictly novice observations. It is possible that upper level dressage horses are just so in tune with their rider, that their expression looks inverted. I know what you all are thinking...SS horses often look scared to death :o . Some probably do, I hope mine look expressive and happy.

_________________
Image/Users/swhipp/Desktop/100_0617.jpg/Users/swhipp/Desktop/DSC01046 (2).JPG


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:04 am
Posts: 64
Location: Missouri
Well said, ASBSrock. I don't know a lot about dressage, either. Other than enjoying watching it occasionally, I have no idea what goes into training a dressage horse. I've often wondered if some of the techniques and aids you see used frequently are really necessary. I think when it affects the horse adversely (and you can tell by a wringing tail, tossing head, fighting the bit, etc.) then it is pushing the limits of right and wrong. I'm not a proponent of never using a whip or spurs, but I definitely don't agree with overuse. I think a lot can be achieved without force, as long as you have the patience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Does Hyperflexion in Dressage Constitute Abuse?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:32 pm
Posts: 71
Yes - there are many different types of frams and hyperflexion is a WRONG one. The thing about being in a correct frame is that it helps the horse carry their rider by rounding their backs. If we're going to ask them to do un natural things, we need to teach them how to do it easier. I don't agree with people cranking their horses into frames - that's how you get hyperflexion a lot of the time. A horse should come into his frame naturally - they are exercising a muscle. Every horse can go into a frame but not all of them can go into a Grand Prix frame. I think this is what some people don't understand - your Quarter Horse, no matter how hard he tries or wants to, will NEVER look like that horse at the Olympics! He's just not built for it. You can have the most delicious, decadent chocolate fudge cake, and you can have a plain ol' funnel cake. Both are cakes, and both are good. They're just different. If you crank your horse into a position guess what? He won't ever want to go back into it! And with hyperflexion, the only way to fix it is to release pressure and to try again, which rewards the horse because that is what he wanted - to get out of his uncomforatble frame. So yes, hyperflexion is very wrong and may even be abusive but frames as a whole actually help the horse.

Oh, about the spurs - they're mandatory past a certain level in dressage and they aren't used for forwardness, they're used to ask for specific movements and to finetune.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Does Hyperflexion in Dressage Constitute Abuse?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:12 am
Posts: 12
Location: Arkansas
I agree it is wrong as many other things in the horse world are. The first thing that came to mind is how good the satisfaction of punching someone in the nose when you know they know they are miss treating an animal. Then ask them how they like it.
I think they should be punched in the nose every time they do something on purpose. I would bet a large amount of money they would soon see the light.
Sorry, I guess I'm in a mood. I just have no tolerance for abuse. What really bothers me is when other people see these things, complain about it, like at a show or at a barn but not do anything to get it stopped or corrected.
In my opinion (yes I know we all have one) they are just as guilty as the abuser.
:| :?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group